Quantitative Analysis/ Regression
Alternative to logistic regression

What is probit regression? Theory, calculation and application

Probit regression is a close relative of logistic regression for yes or no outcomes, common in economics and epidemiology. This guide explains the latent-variable idea, how it differs from logistic regression, how to read its coefficients and turn them into probabilities, and how to run it in AnalyZ Solutions.

13 min read Regression Advanced

01What is probit regression?

Probit regression is a method for studying yes or no outcomes. It shows which factors are linked to the outcome, how strongly, and how likely the outcome is for a particular person.

Many outcomes have only two possible results: a student passed an exam or did not, a patient recovered or did not, a person took up an offer or did not. The thing you want to explain is called the outcome, and the factors you use to explain it are the predictors. The result you are interested in, such as "passed", is the event. Probit regression is a close relative of logistic regression, which does the same job through a slightly different curve.

An example

Suppose you follow 400 students. For each one you know whether they passed an exam, how many hours a week they studied, their number of absences, and their gender. You want to know three things. Does more study time raise the chance of passing? Do women and men differ once study time and absences are taken into account? And what is the chance of passing for a woman who studies 10 hours a week and has 4 absences? Probit regression answers all three.

Why not use an ordinary straight line?

Linear regression fits a straight line to a numeric outcome. For a yes or no outcome, coded 1 for yes and 0 for no, a straight line has two problems. It can predict values below 0% or above 100%, which are impossible chances. And the real pattern is not straight. The chance rises slowly at first, quickly in the middle, and flattens as it approaches certainty. A curve shaped like a stretched letter S fits that pattern, and probit regression fits such a curve.

Figure 1. Why a straight line fits yes or no data badlyDots at the top and bottom show students who passed and did not pass. A straight line crosses above 100 percent and below 0 percent, while an S-shaped curve stays between the limits and follows the dots.Impossible: above 100%Impossible: below 0%0%50%100%05101520Straight line (linear regression)S-shaped curve (probit regression)PassedDid not passWeekly study hours
Figure 1. Why a straight line fits yes or no data badly

What you get out of it

  1. Direction
    Whether each predictor raises or lowers the chance of the event.
  2. Size
    How big the effect is, measured as a shift in an underlying tendency, which a later section explains.
  3. Confidence
    Whether the pattern could easily be chance, shown by a significance level and a confidence interval.
  4. Prediction
    The chance of the event for any combination of predictor values.
Results are adjusted for the other predictors. The effect of each predictor is the effect among people who are the same on the others, so differences in those do not distort it.

02When to use it

Use probit for a binary outcome when your field expects it, or when you have theoretical reasons to think of the outcome as a threshold on an underlying normal tendency. In most applied work, the choice makes little practical difference. The two models classify cases almost identically, and predicted probabilities are nearly the same except in the extreme tails.

The practical difference lies in communication. Logistic regression gives odds ratios that readers can interpret directly. Probit coefficients have no such intuitive translation, which is the main reason logistic regression is often preferred when results must be explained in plain terms.

Probit compared with logistic regression

How the two models differ
FeatureProbitLogistic
LinkThe cumulative normal curveThe log of the odds
Underlying ideaA normal hidden tendency crossing a thresholdOdds that change by a constant ratio
CoefficientsStandard deviations of the hidden tendencyLog-odds
How results are explainedBy direction and predicted probabilitiesAs odds ratios
Tails of the curveLighterSlightly heavier
Typical fieldsEconomics and toxicologyHealth and social research
In AnalyZ SolutionsCoefficient table and plot, no odds ratio toggleOdds ratio toggle and forest plot

03The building blocks: chance, the index and the link

Probit regression rests on three ideas: a single number that combines the predictors, a rule that turns it into a chance, and a hidden tendency that explains the rule.

Chance and the index

A chance, or probability, is a number from 0 to 1, or from 0% to 100%. Probit regression combines the predictors into one number called the index, in the same way as an ordinary straight-line model. The index can be any number, large or small, positive or negative, so it cannot be used as a chance directly. Something has to convert it into a value between 0 and 1.

The link

The rule that turns the index into a chance is called the link. Probit regression uses the cumulative normal curve, written Φ, which gives the area under the bell-shaped normal curve up to a given point. It rises smoothly from 0 to 1, so any index becomes a valid chance. The name probit comes from "probability unit". Logistic regression uses a different link, which works through odds, and the two curves have almost the same shape, as a later figure shows.

The latent-variable idea

Imagine that behind the yes or no outcome sits a hidden continuous tendency, such as a student's underlying readiness to pass an exam. In a probit model each person's tendency equals the index plus a random disturbance that follows a standard normal curve. The outcome is yes when the tendency is above zero. The chance of yes is therefore the area of the normal curve that lies above the threshold, which is Φ(index).

The index moves the whole curve. In the figure, the average tendency for a woman is slightly above zero, so 57% of her curve lies above the threshold, while for a man it is slightly below, so 41% does.

Figure 2. Probit as the area above a threshold on an unobserved normal scaleTwo normal curves centred on slightly different values. The area to the right of a threshold at zero is the chance of passing, 41 percent on the left and 57 percent on the right.Man: study 10 hours, 4 absencesThreshold at 0average tendency -0.22 (dotted line)41%pass59%fail-3-2-10123Unobserved tendency to passWoman: study 10 hours, 4 absencesThreshold at 0average tendency +0.18 (dotted line)57%pass43%fail-3-2-10123Unobserved tendency to pass
Figure 2. Probit as the area above a threshold on an unobserved normal scale

The method was developed in the 1930s for dose-response experiments in toxicology, where each organism has a tolerance and responds once the dose passes it. It remains common in economics, where a decision to act is modelled as a tendency crossing a threshold.

The next section writes this as an equation and shows how the coefficients are found.

04The model and how it is calculated

The model

Probit regression builds an index from the predictors and passes it through the cumulative normal curve, written Φ, which turns any number into a probability between 0 and 1.

index = b0 + b1 × x1 + b2 × x2 + ...
p = Φ( index )

The latent-variable story behind it is that each person has an unobserved tendency, equal to the index plus a random normal disturbance. The outcome is yes when that tendency passes a threshold. Φ(index) is then the probability that the tendency lands above the threshold.

How the coefficients are found

As in logistic regression, the coefficients come from maximum likelihood. The software searches for the values that make the observed yes and no outcomes most probable, and reports the log-likelihood, a likelihood-ratio test, and a pseudo R².

Making a prediction

Take a student who studies 10 hours a week, has 4 absences, and is a woman, using the coefficients from the results below.

  1. Index
    -0.697 + 0.082 × 10 + (-0.087) × 4 + 0.402 × 1 = 0.183.
  2. Probability
    Φ(0.183) = 0.573, or 57%.

For a man with the same hours and absences, the index is -0.218 and the probability is 41%. Unlike the logistic case, no single number such as an odds ratio summarises the gap. The change in probability depends on where the person starts, which is why probit results are usually described by direction and significance.

Probit and logistic compared

The two curves have nearly the same shape. Logistic has slightly heavier tails, and the logistic index runs about 1.7 times larger for the same probability. Multiplying the index by 1.7 makes the logistic curve almost match the probit one, which is why logistic coefficients are typically 1.6 to 1.8 times the size of probit ones.

Figure 3. The probit and logistic curves are nearly the same shapeThree S-shaped curves. The probit curve and the logistic curve with the index multiplied by 1.7 almost overlap, while the plain logistic curve is slightly wider.0%25%50%75%100%-4-3-2-101234Probit: the cumulative normal curveLogistic curve, same indexLogistic curve, index multiplied by 1.7Index value (the straight-line combination of predictors)Predicted chance of the outcome
Figure 3. The probit and logistic curves are nearly the same shape
The same index value turned into a probability by each curve
Index valueProbit probabilityLogistic probability, same indexLogistic probability, index × 1.7
-20.0230.1190.032
-10.1590.2690.154
+00.5000.5000.500
+10.8410.7310.846
+20.9770.8810.968

The probit column and the last column agree closely, and the only noticeable gaps are in the far tails.

05Assumptions

Probit regression rests on a few assumptions. Breaking them does not stop the model from running, but it can mislead.

06Reading the output

Coefficients

Probit coefficients are on the scale of the underlying normal tendency, measured in standard deviations of that tendency. In the example, a coefficient of 0.082 for weekly study hours means that each extra hour raises the average tendency to pass by 0.082 standard deviations. A positive coefficient means the predictor raises the chance of the outcome, and a negative one lowers it. The size of a coefficient cannot be turned into an odds ratio or a percentage change directly, because the effect on the chance depends on where the person starts. A given coefficient changes the probability more for someone near the middle of the range than for someone whose chance is already very high or very low.

For reporting, focus on three things: the direction of each coefficient, its significance level and confidence interval, and the relative size of coefficients for predictors on similar scales. AnalyZ Solutions describes significant predictors as raising or lowering the chance of the outcome. The odds ratio toggle is not offered for probit, since odds ratios belong to the logistic model.

Turning coefficients into probabilities

Because the curve is S-shaped, one coefficient moves the probability by different amounts at different starting points. For a small change, the shift in probability is approximately:

change in probability ≈ b × φ( index )

Here φ is the height of the normal curve at the person's index. Take a woman who studies 10 hours a week and has 4 absences. Her index is 0.183 and φ is 0.392, so one extra study hour raises her chance of passing by about 0.082 × 0.392 = 0.032, or 3.2 percentage points. For a student whose chance is already high, with an index of 1.17 and φ of 0.20, the same hour adds only about 1.6 points, the exact change shown in the figure.

Figure 4. The same coefficient changes the probability by different amountsLeft: an S-shaped probit curve with four marked points. Right: bars showing that one extra study hour adds the most near the middle of the curve and the least near the top.Chance of passing by study hours0%25%50%75%100%0510152025ABCDWeekly study hours (woman, 4 absences)Gain from one extra hour01234+3.0A2 h, 32%+3.3B8 h, 51%+2.8C14 h, 70%+1.6D22 h, 88%Percentage points, from the starting point shown
Figure 4. The same coefficient changes the probability by different amounts

The curve is steepest where the chance is 50%, because φ is largest there at about 0.4. As a rule of thumb, a coefficient times 0.4 is the largest change in probability that one unit of the predictor can produce. AnalyZ Solutions does not report these changes. Calculate them from the coefficients, or compare predicted probabilities for example profiles, as in the worked prediction above.

Model fit

The summary reports the number of cases, the log-likelihood, a likelihood-ratio test, a pseudo R-squared, AIC, and the percentage of cases classified correctly. These are read as in logistic regression. AIC is useful for comparing probit and logistic fits on the same data, with the lower value indicating the better fit.

07How to run it in AnalyZ Solutions

Open Inferential Analysis, choose Regression, then Probit Regression.

  1. Select the dependent variable
    The list shows variables with exactly two categories.
  2. Choose the event of interest
    Pick the value that counts as the outcome.
  3. Select the independent variables
    Choose numeric or categorical predictors.
  4. Set reference categories
    Categorical predictors are converted to comparisons against a reference category automatically. Pick the reference category you want each group compared with, usually the largest or the most natural comparison group.
  5. Apply a subsample filter if needed.
  6. Click Run regression
    The output includes the coefficient table, model summary, a coefficient plot, and a plain-language interpretation.
Fit both and compare. Running logistic and probit regression on the same variables takes seconds. If the significant predictors and their directions agree, which is the usual outcome, you can report the logistic model with odds ratios and mention that probit gave the same conclusions.

08Interpreting the result

The figures below are invented to show the steps, and they follow the results tables in AnalyZ Solutions, with a few columns left out to save space. Suppose 400 students are followed to see whether they passed an exam, using weekly study hours, absences, and gender (reference category: Male) as predictors.

Model summary
NLog-likelihoodLR chi2dfProb > chi2Pseudo R²AICAccuracy %
400-255.074444.363< 0.0010.080518.1562.00
Coefficients
VariableBSEzp-valueSig95% CI lower95% CI upper
Weekly study hours0.0820.0165.040< 0.001***0.0500.115
Absences-0.0870.033-2.6230.0087**-0.151-0.022
Gender: Female (ref: Male)0.4020.1303.0830.0020**0.1460.657

Reading it step by step

  1. Check the model as a whole
    The likelihood-ratio test has a p-value below 0.001, so the predictors together improve on a model with none. Pseudo R² of 0.080 is modest. Accuracy is 62.0%, compared with a pass rate of about 50%, so the model does better than guessing.
  2. Read the direction of each coefficient
    Study hours have a positive coefficient (0.082) and absences a negative one (-0.087). More study raises the chance of passing, and more absences lower it. Both are significant, at the 0.1% and 1% levels.
  3. Read the categorical predictor
    The gender coefficient is 0.402 with a p-value of 0.0020, so women are more likely to pass than men with the same hours and absences. The interval, 0.146 to 0.657, is above zero.
  4. Do not translate coefficients into odds ratios
    Probit coefficients sit on the scale of an underlying normal tendency. The size of a coefficient cannot be read as an odds ratio or a percentage change. Use the direction and significance, and compare sizes only between predictors on similar scales. If you need odds ratios, use logistic regression.

In plain words

Study hours and gender raised the chance of passing, while absences lowered it, all significant at the 1% level or better. The direction and significance are the main findings, and the sizes are on a scale that is hard to explain to a general reader. Running logistic regression on the same variables would give similar conclusions with odds ratios that are easier to describe.

09Common mistakes

Interpreting probit coefficients as odds ratios. They are on a different scale.

Reading a coefficient as a change in probability. A coefficient moves the hidden tendency, not the probability. The change in probability depends on where the person starts and is largest near 50%.

Comparing coefficient sizes with logistic coefficients. Probit coefficients are typically about 0.6 times the size of logistic ones for the same data, a difference that comes from the scale of the curve and does not indicate a weaker effect.

Overlooking separation. A predictor that perfectly divides the outcome cannot be estimated, in either model.

Too many predictors for the number of events. The same guidelines as logistic regression apply.

Frequently Asked Questions
What does a probit coefficient mean?
It is the change in the hidden tendency, measured in standard deviations, for a one-unit rise in the predictor. Its sign gives the direction and its significance tells you whether the effect is distinguishable from zero. To describe the effect on the probability, calculate predicted probabilities for example profiles.
How do I report a probit result to a general reader?
Give the direction and significance of each effect, then translate it into predicted probabilities for a few example people, such as the chance of passing for a woman with 10 study hours and 4 absences compared with a man in the same position. Readers understand percentages far better than coefficients.
When is probit preferable to logistic regression?
When your discipline uses it as a convention, as in much of economics, or when you have a latent-threshold view of the outcome. Otherwise the choice is largely one of presentation, and logistic regression wins on ease of interpretation.
Why are probit coefficients smaller than logistic ones?
The two models use differently scaled curves. Logistic coefficients are typically about 1.6 to 1.8 times larger than probit coefficients for the same relationship. Neither is stronger. The scale differs.
Can I get odds ratios from a probit model?
Not directly. Odds ratios belong to the logistic model. If odds ratios are what your audience needs, use logistic regression.
How do I choose between the two using my data?
Compare AIC values on the same variables. A lower AIC suggests a better fit, though the difference is usually small. Sample size and the presence of extreme probabilities matter more than the choice of link.
Does probit handle more than two outcome categories?
Not in this module. For unordered outcomes with three or more categories use multinomial regression, and for ordered categories use ordinal regression.

Model a binary outcome

Open Regression in AnalyZ Solutions. Free to sign up, free to analyze.

Get started
Related Guides